In the late 90s there was convergence between
traditional independent films and Hollywood. AFM 05
reflected that most well known independent films exist
midway between independent films and studio films. I
have heard the word "Indiewood" to describe
films that suggest their hybrid nature.
|

|
 |
 |
top: Directors Guild of America Panel: Kevin Goetz, Managing Director, Executive Vice President, Entertainment Research, OTX; Catherine Hardwicke, Director, LORDS OF DOGTOWN, Director/Writer,THIRTEEN; Michael London, Producer, SIDEWAYS, HOUSE OF SAND AND FOG,THIRTEEN; Donald Petrie, Director,WELCOME TO MOOSEPORT, MISS CONGENIALITY, GRUMPY OLD MEN; Elias Merhige, Director, SUSPECT ZERO, SHADOW OF THE VAMPIRE. Photo credit:WireImage/Rebecca Sapp.
bottom left: Michael Madsen is Indie films’ hottest working actor. (BLOOD RAYNE, DONNIE BRASCO, SPECIES, RESERVOIR DOGS,THELMA AND LOUISE and many, many more.) Photo credit: WireImage/Rebecca Sapp.
bottom right: Danica McKellar,West Wing,Wonder Years, with Paul T. Boghosian, Executive Producer, HarborSide Films. Photo credit: Paul T. Boghosian. |
A classic example of a hybrid film is Craig
Brewer's HUSTLE AND FLOW, this independent film could
not have a more personal statement by Brewer about a
pimp turned rapper, this film was a highlight at
Sundance last year. Paramount pictures and MTV bought
this $3.5 million film for a record $9 million. The
film was distributed theatrically this past summer and
generated more than $30 million in theatrical revenue
and is expected to gross double that in DVD and cable
revenue.
The Rush to DVD: In past years AFM like other film
markets generated international licensing fees for
their product off the theatrical showcasing of films
that they were selling.
In other words, the more successful the film
was in this theatrical showcasing in North America the
higher the licensing fees would be in the sale of this
film to international markets. This is still the case,
but not the exclusive case.
Factual
market data has been generated to indicate that
certain films will sell well on DVD and ancillary
markets, such as cable, even without a theatrical run.
With DVD, a different set of economics apply. For
example, short films, documentaries and certain
independent features do not fit into traditional
models of territory by territory distribution.
Many international buyers now realize that
theatrical titles are more expensive to buy, cost a
lot to publicize. On the other hand, straight to DVD
titles can be released more quickly and flexibly in
response to market trends. This no more true than with
horror, thriller, and action genres that are preferred
by the younger male audience who as Jan Rickers,
managing director of Germany's Kinwold Home
Entertainment states, "want to see as many
explosions and shootings as possible."
Product Trends: Walking the halls of the Loews
Santa Monica Hotel and talking to dozens of
distributors and sales agents here are a few major
categories that seem to be hot for independent film:
Documentary: The theatrical market for
documentaries in the US has never been hotter.
The non-fiction market doesn't have the same
theatrical growth potential as does the US, but
especially for nature documentaries, such at the MARCH
OF THE PENGUINS and AFM had dozens of docs on whales,
sharks, antelope, zebras and lions; there is a solid
overseas market. Less saleable are docs with a unique
American political perspective.
Horror: Scary films cross cultural divides. Horror
pics have long been a staple product at AFM; horror
has always been hot because it works so well on
DVD-and R rated horror is the genre you cannot get on
television. There is less of a distinction between
what sells in the horror genre in the US and what
sells internationally.
For example SAW II is selling as well if not
better than in the US to essentially the same market
segment of young males from 12-25 years old.
Family Films/animation: With the proliferation of
international cable networks, there has been a
concurrent need for family programming on niche
channels. Again, this is a genre that couples
beautifully with the extremely lucrative children's
home video market. This genre also lends itself to
cross promotion marketing with corporations who are
focused on the age group that the films target through
the characters and storylines.
Chasing tax rebates and co-financing: Independent
film making is all about raising money, raising money
in today's market is all about tax rebates, tax
credits and other soft money finance schemes and
co-financing. At this years' AFM financing panel we
learned that hedge funds have joined "very rich
folk" in putting a toe into the film business to
see if they can get a real return on their investment.
This trend is difficult for independent producers to
capitalize on as most of us raise money on a picture
by picture basis.
However, after listening to this years panel, it is
not unrealistic to think that independent producers
could not gather their projects into one portfolio,
perhaps covering five or six of the most popular
genres selling and attract a hedge fund
to invest lets say $50 million into that portfolio,
this is not an impossibility for producers working on
a strategic partnership with one another.
The Financing/Creative Trade Off: Ashok Armitarj
cautioned that producers should not finance
considerations overrule their creative decisions.
"You try to stay true to the movie. You try not to make a movie that is meant to be shot in New
York City and shoot it in Bulgaria. You don't select a
Canadian actor to put in your movie just to get tax
credits. That's a mistake that is made quite
often."
"As studios reserve their production budgets
for making and marketing hugely expensive summer and
Christmas tent pole films more and more films in the
mid budget range will be financed independently,"
related Hal Sadoff during a panel discussion.
Films today, particularly in the $5-$25 million
range must be organized to maximize the use of foreign
tax shelter and overseas equity funds.
There is no greater trend in film financing
then the rise of co-financing, including shooting
outside the US - or in the selecting of states - to
take advantage of tax credits and other soft money
investments.
It is very easy in New England to work in a market
vacuum, in which each of us can dig deeper into a hole
not realizing that the hole does not lead you
anywhere. It is essential to attend markets like AFM -
and
I believe that AFM is the best market to attend and
worth your time and money investment - to learn what
is happening in the real film world. From the seminars
and contacts that ensue from the seminars can be worth
everything to you as you seek to advance your career,
your film financing options, your ability to pitch new
product, and develop the partnerships that all of us
need to be successful in this most collaborative of
all industries.
Paul T. Boghosian is a long established independent
producer. His company HarborSide Films produces
feature films, public affairs programming for PBS,
cable, and corporate documentaries.
He can be reached at ptbharborside@msn.com